Bridging Loans

Bridge-to-Development Finance: Funding a Site Before Planning or Construction Starts

Property developers face a critical funding gap: securing sites before planning permission is granted. Bridge-to-development finance fills this gap by providing short-term funding to purchase land or buildings while developers navigate the planning process, typically for 12-24 months at rates from 0.75% to 2% monthly.

Published Updated 18 min read
Fred helping a UK business owner compare Bridge-to-Development Finance: Funding a Site Before Planning or Construction Starts

Quick answer

Property developers face a critical funding gap: securing sites before planning permission is granted. Bridge-to-development finance fills this gap by providing short-term funding to purchase land or buildings while developers navigate the planning process, typically for 12-24 months at rates from 0.75% to 2% monthly.

Key takeaways

  • Bridge-to-development finance lets developers secure sites before planning permission is approved
  • Loan terms typically run 12-24 months with monthly interest rates from 0.75% to 2%
  • Lenders focus on exit strategy and developer experience rather than current site income
  • Facilities range from £100k to £25m+ depending on site value and development potential
  • Fast Decision times of 2-14 days help developers compete at auction or secure time-sensitive opportunities
  • Most lenders require 25-40% deposit plus evidence of development experience
  • Interest can be serviced monthly or rolled up until exit
  • Planning risk is the biggest concern - lenders want realistic timescales and backup strategies

Property developers face a critical funding gap: securing sites before planning permission is granted. Bridge-to-development finance fills this gap by providing short-term funding to purchase land or buildings while developers navigate the planning process, typically for 12-24 months at rates from 0.75% to 2% monthly.

What Exactly Is Bridge-to-Development Finance and How Does It Work

Fred explaining Bridge-to-Development Finance and How Does It Work to a UK business owner

Bridge-to-development finance provides Short-Term Funding to purchase sites before planning permission or construction finance is in place. Unlike traditional development loans that fund the build phase, this financing secures the land first.

The process works in three stages. First, developers identify a site with development potential but need to move quickly before planning is secured. Second, bridging finance provides the capital to purchase within days rather than months. Third, once planning permission is granted, developers refinance onto construction finance or sell to another developer.

Typical loan structure

  • Loan-to-value: 60-75% of site purchase price
  • Term: 12-24 months with extension options
  • Interest: Monthly payments or rolled up until exit
  • Security: First charge over the development site
  • Exit: Refinance to development finance or sale

The key advantage is speed and Flexible Criteria. While banks take 8-12 weeks to approve development finance, Specialist partners can complete bridge-to-development loans in 7-14 days. This lets developers secure sites at auction or beat cash buyers to off-market opportunities.

Choose bridge-to-development finance if you need to act within weeks rather than months, have a clear planning strategy, and can service higher short-term interest rates for the competitive advantage.

How Bridge Financing Differs from Traditional Construction Loans

Fred explaining How Bridge Financing Differs from Traditional Construction Loans to a UK business owner

Bridge-to-development finance and construction loans serve different phases of the development process. Bridge financing secures the site before planning, while construction loans fund the actual build after planning permission is granted.

Key differences:

How Bridge Financing Differs from Traditional Construction Loans comparison table
Bridge-to-DevelopmentConstruction Loans
Pre-planning phasePost-planning phase
12-24 month terms12-36 month terms
0.75-2% monthly rates0.5-1.5% monthly rates
Land value securityDevelopment value security
7-14 day approval4-12 week approval
Planning riskConstruction risk

Construction lenders want detailed planning permission, quantity surveyor reports, and pre-sales before advancing funds. Bridge lenders focus on site potential and developer track record instead.

The funding amounts differ too. Bridge loans typically cover 60-75% of land cost, while construction finance can reach 70-80% of total development costs including build expenses.

Use bridge financing to secure sites quickly, then refinance to development finance once planning and construction details are finalised.

Typical Interest Rates for Bridge-to-Development Loans

Bridge-to-development finance rates typically range from 0.75% to 2% per month, depending on loan size, developer experience, and site complexity. This translates to annual rates of 9-24%, significantly higher than traditional development finance.

Rate factors that lenders consider

  • Developer experience: Established developers get rates from 0.75-1.2% monthly
  • Loan size: Larger facilities (£1m+) often secure better pricing
  • Site complexity: Straightforward residential sites get preferential rates
  • Planning prospects: Strong pre-application advice reduces rates
  • Loan-to-value: Lower LTV deals (60% vs 75%) get better pricing

Additional costs to factor in

  • Arrangement fees: 1-2% of facility size
  • Legal fees: £2,000-£5,000 depending on complexity
  • Valuation costs: £1,500-£3,500 for development sites
  • Exit fees: Some lenders charge 1% on early repayment

Interest can be serviced monthly or rolled up until exit. Monthly servicing keeps total costs lower but requires cash flow. Rolled-up interest suits developers who prefer to pay everything on refinancing or sale.

Choose monthly servicing if you have steady cash flow from other projects. Opt for rolled-up interest if you need to preserve working capital for planning costs and site preparation.

Who Qualifies for Bridge-to-Development Financing

Bridge-to-development lenders focus on developer experience and site potential rather than traditional credit scoring. Most require evidence of completed developments and realistic exit strategies.

Typical qualification criteria

  • Development experience: At least 2-3 completed projects or strong construction background
  • Financial strength: Ability to service interest and contribute deposit
  • Site viability: Clear development potential with realistic planning prospects
  • Exit strategy: Credible refinancing or sale plan within loan term
  • Deposit: 25-40% of site purchase price available

Developer profiles that typically qualify

  • Experienced property developers expanding their portfolio
  • Construction companies moving into development
  • Property investors with refurbishment experience
  • Joint ventures between experienced and financial partners

Profiles that struggle

  • First-time developers with no construction background
  • Developers with recent project failures or delays
  • Applicants without clear planning strategy
  • Those unable to demonstrate financial resilience

Lenders particularly value developers who can show successful planning applications, completed builds on time and budget, and strong relationships with planning consultants and contractors.

Common qualification mistake: Assuming residential investment experience translates to development lending. Lenders want to see actual development projects, not just buy-to-let portfolios.

If you're new to development, consider partnering with an experienced developer or starting with smaller, lower-risk projects to build a track record before pursuing larger bridge-to-development facilities.

Key Risks Developers Need to Watch Out For

Planning risk represents the biggest concern with bridge-to-development finance. If planning permission is refused or significantly delayed, developers face extended interest costs and potential losses on exit.

Primary risks to manage:

Planning delays or refusal

  • Get pre-application advice before purchasing
  • Budget for planning consultant and architect fees
  • Have backup strategies if initial plans are rejected
  • Consider sites with existing planning or permitted development rights

Interest rate exposure

  • Monthly rates can compound quickly on extended terms
  • Budget for 6-12 months longer than expected planning timeline
  • Consider interest rate caps or fixed-rate options
  • Maintain cash reserves for extended interest periods

Exit strategy failure

  • Development finance might not be available when needed
  • Site values could fall between purchase and exit
  • Construction costs might exceed initial estimates
  • Pre-sales or end buyers might not materialise

Market conditions

  • Property values can shift during the loan term
  • Development finance rates might increase significantly
  • Construction material costs often rise during planning phase
  • Local market demand could weaken

Mitigation strategies

  • Work with experienced planning consultants from day one
  • Maintain 25-30% contingency above minimum interest reserves
  • Secure development finance agreements in principle early
  • Consider fixed-price construction contracts where possible

Biggest mistake: Underestimating planning timescales. Local authority planning departments often take 12-16 weeks for straightforward applications, longer for complex schemes. Budget accordingly.

Choose sites with strong planning prospects and experienced professional teams to minimise these risks. The speed advantage of bridge financing only works if you can execute the planning and exit strategy efficiently.

Bridge Financing for Small vs Large Development Firms

Bridge-to-development finance is available to both small and large developers, but loan structures and requirements vary significantly based on company size and experience.

Small developers (£100k-£2m facilities)

  • Higher rates: typically 1.5-2% monthly due to perceived higher risk
  • Stricter criteria: need stronger track records relative to loan size
  • Personal guarantees: usually required from directors
  • Limited leverage: 60-70% LTV more common than 75%
  • Faster decisions: smaller loans often complete in 7-10 days

Large development firms (£2m+ facilities)

  • Better rates: 0.75-1.2% monthly for established developers
  • More flexible terms: longer extension options and higher LTV
  • Corporate guarantees: personal guarantees less common
  • Portfolio cross-security: can use other assets to strengthen applications
  • Complex structures: joint ventures and SPV arrangements available

Mid-size developers benefit from

  • Competitive rates around 1-1.5% monthly
  • Mix of personal and corporate security options
  • Access to larger facilities as track record grows
  • Relationship banking with specialist lenders

Key advantages for smaller developers

  • Speed beats size - can compete with cash buyers at auction
  • Lower absolute interest costs on smaller loans
  • Opportunity to build relationships with specialist lenders
  • Stepping stone to larger development finance facilities

Common small developer mistake: Assuming they can't access bridge financing due to company size. Many Specialist partners actively lend to smaller developers with good track records.

The key is matching loan size to experience level. A developer with 2-3 completed projects can typically access facilities worth 2-3 times their largest previous project value.

Required Documents for Bridge-to-Development Applications

Bridge-to-development applications require specific documentation focused on development experience, site potential, and financial capacity. Preparation speeds up approval significantly.

Essential documents for all applications

  • Site details: Purchase contract, title documents, site plans
  • Development proposal: Initial sketches, density studies, planning pre-app advice
  • Financial information: 3 years accounts, bank statements, cash flow projections
  • Experience evidence: CV, previous project summaries, references from professionals
  • Legal structure: Company documents if applying through SPV or limited company

Development-specific requirements

  • Planning consultant's initial assessment
  • Architect's feasibility study and initial drawings
  • Surveyor's site appraisal and development valuation
  • Construction cost estimates from quantity surveyor or contractor
  • Market research on end values or rental potential

Financial documentation

  • Proof of deposit funds and source
  • Evidence of ability to service interest during term
  • Details of existing development finance relationships
  • Insurance arrangements for site and development risks

Professional team details

  • Planning consultant credentials and local experience
  • Architect's relevant project portfolio
  • Quantity surveyor's development experience
  • Solicitor's property development expertise

Application timeline

  • Day 1: Submit initial application with key documents
  • Day 2-3: Lender reviews and requests additional information
  • Day 4-7: Valuation and legal review conducted
  • Day 7-14: Final approval and legal completion

Common documentation mistakes

  • Submitting residential investment accounts instead of development experience
  • Providing generic feasibility studies rather than site-specific analysis
  • Missing proof of deposit source - lenders need clear funds trail
  • Incomplete professional team appointments

Prepare documentation packages before identifying sites. This lets you move within days when the right opportunity appears, crucial for auction purchases or competitive off-market deals.

How Quickly Can Bridge Financing Be Approved

Bridge-to-development finance typically completes within 7-14 days from application to funds release, significantly faster than traditional development finance which takes 8-12 weeks.

Typical approval timeline

  • Days 1-2: Application review and initial credit assessment
  • Days 3-5: Site valuation and legal review of title
  • Days 6-8: Final underwriting and loan offer issued
  • Days 9-14: Legal completion and funds transfer

Factors that speed up approval

  • Complete documentation package submitted upfront
  • Established relationship with the lender
  • Straightforward site with clear title
  • Experienced developer with strong track record
  • Standard loan structure without complex terms

Factors that cause delays

  • Missing or incomplete documentation
  • Complex site issues or title problems
  • First-time applicant requiring detailed due diligence
  • Unusual loan structures or security arrangements
  • Legal complications with purchase contracts

Express services available: Some Specialist partners offer 48-72 hour completion for premium rates, typically adding 0.25-0.5% monthly to standard pricing. This suits auction purchases where exchange is required within days.

Auction finance considerations

  • Apply before auction with conditional approval
  • Ensure funds can be released within 28 days of exchange
  • Have legal team ready to exchange immediately after successful bid
  • Consider higher rates for guaranteed completion speed

Record completion times:

  1. 1

    Fastest

    24-48 hours for repeat clients with simple deals

  2. 2

    Standard

    7-10 days for well-prepared applications

  3. 3

    Complex

    14-21 days for first-time applicants or complicated sites

Preparation checklist for fast approval

  • Maintain relationships with 2-3 bridge lenders
  • Keep standard documentation updated and ready
  • Use experienced property lawyers familiar with bridge finance
  • Have surveyor and valuer contacts for quick site assessments

The speed advantage only works if you're prepared. Developers who maintain ready documentation and lender relationships can compete effectively against cash buyers in competitive markets.

What Happens If Development Projects Fall Through

When development projects fail during bridge-to-development finance terms, lenders and borrowers have several options depending on the specific circumstances and loan terms.

Planning permission refused: Most bridge loans include extension options if planning is delayed or initially refused. Lenders typically allow 6-12 month extensions at similar rates, giving developers time to appeal or submit revised applications.

Market conditions deteriorate: If property values fall significantly, developers might face negative equity situations. Options include additional cash injection to maintain loan-to-value ratios, negotiated sale with shortfall agreement, or conversion to longer-term investment financing.

Developer financial difficulties: Lenders prefer negotiated solutions over enforcement. Common approaches include bringing in joint venture partners, selling to other developers, or agreeing payment holidays while marketing the site.

Exit strategy options when projects fail

  • Sale to another developer: Often the cleanest exit if market conditions allow
  • Conversion to investment loan: Some lenders offer longer-term facilities secured on land value
  • Joint venture arrangements: Bringing in experienced partners with capital
  • Phased development: Breaking larger schemes into smaller, more manageable phases

Lender enforcement process

  • Initial discussions about workout solutions
  • Formal demand if no agreement reached
  • Appointment of receivers if necessary
  • Forced sale through auction or private treaty

Borrower protection strategies

  • Maintain open communication with lenders about challenges
  • Engage professional advisors early when problems emerge
  • Consider partial sales or joint ventures before situations become critical
  • Keep detailed records of all expenditure and professional advice

Insurance considerations: Some lenders offer or require insurance products covering planning refusal or developer default. These add 0.1-0.3% to monthly costs but provide additional security.

Most experienced bridge lenders prefer negotiated exits over enforcement. The key is maintaining professional relationships and exploring solutions before problems become insurmountable.

Alternatives to Bridge Financing for Pre-Construction Funding

Several alternatives exist to bridge-to-development finance, each with different risk profiles, costs, and speed characteristics.

Joint venture partnerships: Partnering with established developers or investors provides capital without debt servicing. Partners typically contribute 50-70% of site costs in exchange for equivalent profit shares. This reduces risk but dilutes returns.

Private investor funding: High-net-worth individuals often provide development funding at rates between traditional bank finance and bridge loans. Terms are typically 12-24 months at 8-15% annual rates with profit-sharing arrangements.

Option agreements: Rather than purchasing sites immediately, developers can secure option agreements giving exclusive rights to buy within 12-24 months. This requires smaller upfront payments but risks losing sites if sellers receive better offers.

Vendor finance arrangements: Some sellers, particularly those with planning expertise, will accept deferred payment terms. Developers pay deposits of 10-25% with balance due on planning approval or sale to builders.

Development finance with land acquisition: A few specialist lenders provide integrated facilities covering both land purchase and construction phases. These take longer to arrange (6-12 weeks) but offer lower overall costs.

Alternative comparison:

Alternatives to Bridge Financing for Pre-Construction Funding comparison table

Bridge Finance

Speed
1-2 weeks
Cost
High
Risk Level
Medium
Capital Required
25-40% deposit

Joint Venture

Speed
4-8 weeks
Cost
Medium
Risk Level
Low
Capital Required
0-30% capital

Private Investor

Speed
2-6 weeks
Cost
Medium
Risk Level
Medium
Capital Required
10-30% deposit

Option Agreement

Speed
1-2 weeks
Cost
Low
Risk Level
High
Capital Required
5-15% option fee

Vendor Finance

Speed
2-4 weeks
Cost
Low
Risk Level
Medium
Capital Required
10-25% deposit

Which is right for you?

Choose bridge financing when

  • Speed is critical for competitive situations
  • You want to maintain full project control
  • Site has strong planning prospects
  • You have experience managing development risks

Choose alternatives when

  • Cost is more important than speed
  • You prefer to share development risks
  • Capital is limited for large deposits
  • Sites have uncertain planning outcomes

Many successful developers use combinations of these approaches. Bridge financing might secure an initial site, followed by joint venture partners for the development phase, optimising both speed and capital efficiency.

Common Mistakes Developers Make with Bridge Loans

Developers new to bridge-to-development finance often make costly errors that can derail projects or significantly increase costs.

Underestimating total costs: Many developers focus only on headline interest rates, ignoring arrangement fees, legal costs, valuation expenses, and potential extension charges. Total costs typically add 3-5% to the headline rate over 18-month terms.

Inadequate planning timeline budgets: Local authority planning processes often take longer than expected. Developers should budget for 18-24 months total term, not the optimistic 12 months often assumed. Planning delays are common and expensive.

Weak exit strategy planning: Assuming development finance will be automatically available when needed is risky. Market conditions, lending criteria, and personal circumstances can change. Always have backup exit plans including sale options.

Insufficient cash reserves: Bridge loans require monthly interest servicing or rolled-up interest reserves. Many developers underestimate these amounts, particularly if planning takes longer than expected. Maintain 6-12 months additional interest reserves beyond expected timeline.

Poor professional team selection: Using inexperienced planning consultants or architects to save money often costs more in delays and refusals. Local planning expertise is crucial for complex sites or sensitive locations.

Inadequate due diligence on sites: Rushing site purchases without proper technical due diligence can reveal expensive problems later. Ground conditions, utilities, access rights, and contamination issues can derail projects.

Overleveraging on loan-to-value: Taking maximum 75% LTV loans leaves no buffer for cost overruns or value fluctuations. Conservative 60-65% LTV provides more security and often better rates.

Ignoring market timing: Starting projects at market peaks or during uncertain economic periods increases exit risks. Consider market cycles when planning development timelines.

Communication failures with lenders: Not updating lenders on planning progress or challenges can damage relationships. Regular communication helps when extensions or variations are needed.

Mixing bridge and development finance: Trying to use bridge loans for construction phases or development loans for land acquisition rarely works well. Each product serves specific purposes with different risk profiles.

Prevention strategies

  • Work with experienced property lawyers and accountants
  • Maintain relationships with multiple lenders and professional advisors
  • Build detailed project timelines with realistic contingencies
  • Keep comprehensive records of all costs and professional advice

Success with bridge-to-development finance requires treating it as one component of a comprehensive development strategy, not a standalone solution to funding challenges.

Down Payment Requirements for Bridge Development Financing

Bridge-to-development lenders typically require deposits of 25-40% of site purchase price, significantly higher than residential mortgages but lower than some commercial property investments.

Standard deposit requirements

  • Experienced developers: 25-30% minimum deposit
  • First-time development borrowers: 35-40% deposit typically required
  • Complex or high-risk sites: Up to 50% deposit may be needed
  • Prime locations with strong planning prospects: Sometimes 25% acceptable

Factors affecting deposit requirements

  • Developer track record: Proven experience reduces deposit needs
  • Site risk profile: Straightforward residential sites need lower deposits
  • Planning prospects: Strong pre-application advice improves terms
  • Market conditions: Uncertain markets increase deposit requirements
  • Loan size: Larger facilities sometimes accept lower percentage deposits

Sources of deposit funding

  • Cash reserves: Most straightforward but ties up working capital
  • Sale of existing properties: Common for serial developers
  • Joint venture partners: Sharing deposit reduces individual exposure
  • Second charge finance: Some lenders allow additional borrowing for deposits
  • Cross-collateralisation: Using other property assets as additional security

Deposit timing considerations: Deposits must be available immediately on exchange of contracts. Bridge lenders typically require proof of deposit source and availability before issuing loan offers.

Additional cash requirements beyond deposit

  • Interest reserves: 6-18 months interest depending on loan structure
  • Professional fees: £15k-£50k for planning, legal, and surveyor costs
  • Site preparation: Security, insurance, and basic maintenance costs
  • Contingency funds: 10-20% buffer for unexpected costs or delays

Deposit reduction strategies

  • Build strong track record with smaller projects first
  • Use experienced professional teams to reduce perceived risk
  • Consider joint ventures to share deposit requirements
  • Negotiate vendor finance or option agreements to reduce upfront costs

Conservative deposit levels provide better negotiating positions with lenders and more financial flexibility if projects face unexpected challenges or delays.

Best Property Types for Bridge-to-Development Finance

Certain property types work particularly well with bridge-to-development finance due to planning predictability, market demand, and exit strategy clarity.

Residential development sites: Small to medium residential schemes (5-50 units) represent the most common bridge-to-development applications. Local planning policies often support housing delivery, and end markets are well-established.

Commercial to residential conversions: Office buildings, warehouses, and retail properties with residential conversion potential benefit from permitted development rights or supportive planning policies. These often have clearer planning routes than greenfield sites.

Brownfield regeneration: Previously developed land with existing infrastructure often receives planning support. Environmental remediation costs need careful evaluation, but planning prospects are typically strong.

Urban infill developments: Small sites within established residential areas usually align with local planning policies. Limited site constraints and proven local demand make these attractive to bridge lenders.

Property types that work less well:

Large greenfield sites: Sites requiring significant infrastructure, environmental assessments, or Section 106 agreements face longer planning processes and higher risk of refusal.

Listed buildings or conservation areas: Complex planning requirements, specialist expertise needs, and uncertain outcomes make these challenging for short-term bridge finance.

Commercial developments: Office, retail, or industrial developments often face longer planning processes and more uncertain end markets compared to residential schemes.

Agricultural land without planning: Sites requiring change of use from agricultural to residential face significant planning risks and extended timescales.

Site selection criteria for bridge financing

  • Planning policy alignment: Sites that support local housing or regeneration policies
  • Infrastructure availability: Existing utilities, access roads, and services
  • Market demand evidence: Strong local property markets with active buyer interest
  • Professional team experience: Access to consultants with relevant local expertise
  • Realistic timescales: Planning achievable within 12-18 months

Due diligence priorities

  • Planning consultant's initial assessment and strategy
  • Environmental surveys and contamination reports
  • Utilities capacity and connection costs
  • Access rights and highway authority requirements
  • Local market analysis and end value assessment

Best practice: Focus on sites where planning success is highly probable rather than speculative opportunities. Bridge finance works best for execution risk rather than planning risk.

Choose sites that align with local planning policies, have strong infrastructure, and benefit from proven local demand. This maximises chances of successful planning applications and profitable exits within bridge loan terms.

Next steps for bridge to development finance funding a site before planning or construction sta

Bridge-to-development finance offers property developers a powerful tool to secure sites quickly while navigating the planning process. With facilities from £100k to £25m+ available within 7-14 days, developers can compete effectively against cash buyers and secure time-sensitive opportunities.

Success requires careful planning around three key areas: realistic budgeting for 18-24 month terms including interest and professional costs, strong exit strategies through development finance or sale options, and experienced professional teams to maximise planning success prospects.

The higher costs of bridge financing - typically 0.75-2% monthly plus fees - are justified by the competitive advantages and profit potential of securing the right sites quickly. However, developers must maintain adequate cash reserves and have clear backup plans if planning takes longer than expected.

For developers ready to move quickly on the right opportunities, bridge-to-development finance provides the speed and Flexible Criteria that traditional lenders cannot match. The key is matching loan terms to realistic project timescales and maintaining professional relationships that support successful outcomes.

Ready to explore bridge-to-development finance options? Check Eligibility Now with our 2 min check - No hard check to start and connect with Specialist partners who understand development finance requirements.

Further reading

Frequently asked questions

What Exactly Is Bridge-to-Development Finance and How Does It Work?

Bridge-to-development finance provides Short-Term Funding to purchase sites before planning permission or construction finance is in place. Unlike traditional development loans that fund the build phase, this financing secures the land first.

How Bridge Financing Differs from Traditional Construction Loans?

Bridge-to-development finance and construction loans serve different phases of the development process. Bridge financing secures the site before planning, while construction loans fund the actual build after planning permission is granted.

Who Qualifies for Bridge-to-Development Financing?

Bridge-to-development lenders focus on developer experience and site potential rather than traditional credit scoring. Most require evidence of completed developments and realistic exit strategies.

How Quickly Can Bridge Financing Be Approved?

Bridge-to-development finance typically completes within 7-14 days from application to funds release, significantly faster than traditional development finance which takes 8-12 weeks.

What Happens If Development Projects Fall Through?

When development projects fail during bridge-to-development finance terms, lenders and borrowers have several options depending on the specific circumstances and loan terms.

Written by

Funding Fred Editorial Team

The Funding Fred Editorial Team creates plain-English guides to help business owners understand funding options, eligibility, and application readiness before they compare finance options.

Reviewed by

Robert Daly

UK business finance content reviewer

Robert reads our UK business finance guides before they go live, checking each one is accurate, easy to follow, and reflects how lending actually works today — not how a brochure says it should. He's listed on the FCA Register, approved as an SMF3 (AR) Executive Director at Switcha Limited, and connected to Lucky Growth Partners Ltd through its appointed representative relationship, so the regulated detail gets a properly qualified second read.

Sources

Bridge-to-Development Finance: Fast Site Funding